Do people say

English sentences with fuels discussion in context,

3 exact matches

Because criticism and satire fuel discussion and give us a set of checks and balances.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

How is this meant to fuel discussion?
source: Redditshow contexthide context

The only point in commenting is to fuel discussion, and there is none when every non-Pats fan is either farming the post for karma or complaining about Pats fans.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Since discussion isn't possible in the live feed, and TRG wants to do an AMA, I think the live feed will help fuel the discussion thread.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Other than that, when you listen you get info, among that info hopefully there'll be lots of material that can be re-used by you to fuel the discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Research reactor fuel failures have been harmless and expected, however, if you want to talk about weapons reactors we really would need to frame this entire discussion under different light.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Not a complete answer and I'm just going off the top of my head from other discussions, but I'm pretty sure it has something to do with gravity not being able to hold the star together like when it was younger (possibly from burning its fuel and less mass?).
source: Redditshow contexthide context

It's an important discussion, apart from hydroelectric and some designs of tidal renewables are too unreliable to replace fossil fuels as baseload power.
source: Reddit

I could spark a discussion about cow feces as fuel, but does it help the topic at hand?
source: Redditshow contexthide context

You have said you don't care about bitcoin - so my question.. which you've managed to avoid answering, is what fuels you spending so much time in a discussion subreddit relating to something you don't care about?
source: Redditshow contexthide context

But the discussion is about whether the amount of fuel taxes paid by truck operators is proportionate to the wear and tear they put on the roads.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

This will fuel people's frustration that they weren't there to experience it too and you can't bring anything to the discussion to bridge that gap.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I have disdain for them because the individuals in that sub that simply add fuel to the fire of hatred for any kind of rational discussion are no better than anyone else who adds to the divisive commentary.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I certainly enjoy this sub, but I do sometimes wonder whether our continued discussion of GG fuels their ongoing rage (and in turn their continued harassment of people.)
source: Redditshow contexthide context

When people get offended some of the less intelligent people get uncomfortable and lash out at anything that continues the discussion or fuels the controversy because they are basically children throwing a tantrum.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I had such a long discussion with a faithist on debate a Christian about this - private data alone can do no work, it's like fuel without a fire.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I think the first one needs discussion, but I DO think a lot of it's stirred up by the tabloids, the second however, anything that gets our reliance off fossil fuels has to be a good thing, take our reliance off Russia, and indeed the middle east.
source: Reddit

Join SanDiego350 and local and state-wide allies in a panel discussion to learn about the fracking – climate connection, what’s happening in California, and what we can do to stop harmful “extreme extraction” of fossil fuels in our State.
source: Reddit

From my discussions with them I have found that essentially the air turbulence caused by planes flying through it is called "wake turbulence", and is only really a factor when doing things like following a point man in a defensive formation and you drift off, as usually formations are "formed" around the aerodynamics and can be used to increase fuel efficiency, much like drafting in auto-racing.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

No to Keystone, discussion with China, aggressively boosted fuel efficiency standards in cars, declared CO2 a pollutant, etc.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

You - discussion about the process of creating liquid fuels from electricity, but no answer to the actual question.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

In the research paper that has spawned the recent discussion of this claims that for a Mars mission, it would reduce fuel consumption by 25%.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Being obsessively pedantic about the terms, and codifiyng absolute definitions isn't really fuel for an interesting discussion, it's just a method of being inane.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Better to respect the animal, fuel a culture, and identify the discussions such a show produces, no?
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Had this discussion with a friend recently and we both doubt we'll see prices of goods fall with lower fuel costs.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

You are completely clueless when it comes to the Koch brothers, Koch Industries, hydrofracking, the fossil fuel industry, etc., but that obviously didn't stop you from making uneducated, irrelevant, and nonsensical comments in this discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Whether or not our fossil fuels run out in your lifetime, I'm damned impressed that an octogenarian is contributing to this discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I'd rather have a discussion somewhere where I feel comfortable debating inculpatory as well as exculpatory stuff without worrying that I'm coming off as a "brainwashed, dairy-cow loving drone" or without worrying that I'm giving fuel to the rabid lynch mob.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I'd also like to see more discussion about the limitations of fossil fuel peaks on long-term GHG forecasts.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Where are the skeptics like yourself in all the other discussions where people take it as a given that fossil fuels are subsidized?
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Don't know if this is a sentiment here but I really hate nationalism; if you want to make your current community a better place fine, if you want to include beliefs from your past generations fine: just don't use those beliefs to fuel hatred that brings nothing to the discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Yeah, the timing of these events isn't exactly the best, there was a lot of pent-up frustration and heated discussion about immigrants and this topic in general, these events only gave more fuel to this hatred, I wouldn't mind it though, the internet tends to give voice to extremes rather than any type of meaningful debate.
source: Reddit

I'm not going to get into a political discussion, but FYI, the falling fuel (oil) prices have nothing to do with Obama.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I'd rather have a discussion somewhere where I feel comfortable debating inculpatory as well as exculpatory stuff without worrying that I'm coming off as a "brainwashed, dairy-cow loving drone" or without worrying that I'm giving fuel to the rabid lynch mob.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

No to Keystone, discussion with China, aggressively boosted fuel efficiency standards in cars, declared CO2 a pollutant, etc.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

No to Keystone, discussion with China, aggressively boosted fuel efficiency standards in cars, declared CO2 a pollutant, etc.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I think the discussion on the Keystone XL and fossil fuel constraints is a good one, but probably best saved for another day.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

All I can find lurking and googling is from old discussions of how to implement fuel in the first place, which I assume isn't very up to date.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I thought this discussion was going to be about fuel economy when throttling the center engine down for landing.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

No to Keystone, discussion with China, aggressively boosted fuel efficiency standards in cars, declared CO2 a pollutant, etc.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Hey we care about this global warming thing let's fly 1700 jets dumping an additional million plus gallons of fuel into the atmosphere instead of you know use technology like a Skype based turn based discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

The media is sort of stumped policy-wise on the federal level right now - mainly just freaking out about discussion papers and state politics - this it will give some fuel to some of our major commentators as they return from holidays.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Afraid not, no fuel for actual discussion here.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Seems more like propaganda than discussion.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

It's clear there's another comment that has exactly the same content, and that having two is redundant, so the second of the two should get downvoted to let the user know that their comment is redundant, and that they should delete it to clean up the comments and make discussion that little bit easier.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

My post still seems to be here, since it is about information and discussion, not just a bunch of insults like yours was.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

Music shouldn't come into the discussion on this video, this is a lovely gesture by a celebrity to their fans.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

I was on mobile so unable to type out a long discussion on this, but that's precisely one of the objections to the data I was going to raise.
source: Redditshow contexthide context

What happens in every single one of these anti-Russia circlejerk threads which means we can not have any meaningful discussion on geopolitics on r/worldnews.
source: Reddit

For me, it was a quick blood pressure check, a basic discussion about my medical history, a vision check, a short chat (obviously to check for psychological issues), and that was that.
source: Redditshow contexthide context